Help shape catalog controls
Review how Clef connects recordings and compositions, records permissions, and helps labels and publishers administer their catalogs. Tell us what your team would need to use it.
The public alpha uses synthetic examples. Start with the walkthrough, then explore the part that matters to your work.
The MLC supplies U.S. publishing information and DSP-supplied recording references. Labels and publishers provide evidence of the rights, shares and territories they control.
Read how each source supports a decisionWhat would make Clef useful to you?
Choose the perspective closest to your work. Each one asks a question the alpha cannot answer alone.
Read the technical review guide ↗Labels, publishers and rights organizations
Follow a request through catalog terms, rights evidence, approval, and reporting. Which decisions, team roles, or client requirements should the workflow handle?
Artists, songwriters and managers
Look at how permitted uses, credits, and payment evidence are recorded. What would you need to understand, agree to, or challenge?
Music-data and standards specialists
Review how recording and composition references, including ISRCs and ISWCs, relate to rights records. Which matching evidence or exchange fields would your organization require?
License seekers and AI developers
Try describing your intended use, source material, model, and duration. Can you express the request and understand the terms you would need to fulfill?
Implementation, security and legal teams
Review installation, access controls, supporting contracts, and signed records. What would your organization need before running Clef for its clients?
Researchers, advocates and supporters
Examine the public source and sample workflow. What evidence would help you assess its usefulness to creators or support an installation?
Technical feedback goes to GitHub
Each route opens a template, so your report reaches the people who maintain that part of the code.
- Report a bug
Reproducible behavior using synthetic or fully consented evidence.
- Propose a record-format change
Describe the information your systems need to exchange, with an example.
- Standards gap
Identify the workflow and standard version that need closer examination.
- Private security report
Exploits, credentials, personal data, or unredacted catalog evidence.
What would your team need?
We may publish the substance of accepted, rejected, and unresolved feedback. Public attribution to you or your organization requires your approval.